Higher average temperatures
mean much more frequent droughts and trees dying faster in droughts
because of the temperatures.
That plus pine beetles, according to research from 2009.
Forestry is Georgia’s second largest industry
in terms of
employment and wages and salaries,
more than $28 billion a year
according to the Georgia Forestry Commission,
plus an estimated
$36 billion a year in ecosystem services
such as water filtration, carbon storage, wildlife habitat, and aesthetics,
not to mention hunting and fishing.
Climate change matters to Georgia’s forests and to Georgia.
The paper appeared 13 April 2009 in the Proceedings of the National Academy
of the Sciences,
Temperature sensitivity of drought-induced tree mortality portends increased regional die-off under global-change-type drought,
by
Henry D. Adams, Maite Guardiola-Claramonte, Greg A. Barron-Gafford, Juan Camilo Villegas, David D. Breshears, Chris B. Zou, Peter A. Troch, and Travis E. Huxman,
106(17) 7063-7066,
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901438106.
All drought trees in the warmer treatment died before any of the drought
trees in the ambient treatment (on average 18.0 vs. 25.1 weeks, P <0.01;
Fig. 1A).
They say warmer trees dying faster in drought
wasn’t due to a difference in amount of water.
Instead, they infer the warmer trees couldn’t breathe.
Combined, our results provide experimental evidence that piñon
pines attempted to avoid drought-induced mortality by regulating
stomata and foregoing further photosynthesis but subsequently
succumbed to drought due to carbon starvation, not sudden hydraulic
failure. Importantly, we isolate the effect of temperature from
other climate variables and biotic agents
and show that the effect
of warmer temperature in conjunction with drought can be
substantial.
Our results imply that future warmer temperatures will not only
increase background rates of tree mortality (13, 16), but also
result in more frequent widespread vegetation die-off events (3, 35)
through an exacerbation of metabolic stress associated with drought.
With warmer temperatures, droughts of shorter duration—which
occur more frequently—would be sufficient to cause widespread
die-off.
How much more frequently?
They calculated an estimate for that, too: five times more frequently.
Of course, that’s for the specific kinds of forests they were studying,
and the exact number may vary, but the general trend is clear:
higher temperatures mean more frequent droughts,
like
the year-long drought we just experienced in south Georgia.
This projection is conservative because it is based on the
historical drought record and therefore does not include changes in
drought frequency, which is predicted to increase concurrently with
warming (2, 37—39). In addition, populations of tree pests,
such as bark beetles, which are often the proximal cause of
mortality in this species and others, are also expected to increase
with future warming (7, 9, 38).
Bark beetles, such as the ones that bored into this 19 inch slash pine
and spread from there to twenty others I had to cut down to prevent further spread
of the pine beetles.
What happens when pine beetles spread
is what you see in the
first picture in this post:
acres and acres of dead red pine trees.
Monoculture slash pine plantations may show this effect most clearly,
but look around here, and you’ll see red dead loblolly and longleaf pines,
too.
The article is saying that if the beetles don’t get the trees
weakened by droughts that will be much more frequent,
the trees will die more quickly of suffocation,
because the temperature is higher.
Higher temperatures is something that should concern every Georgian
in our state where forestry is the second largest industry and our forests
protect our wildlife and the air that we breathe and the water that we drink.
-jsq
On the evening of April 8, 1999, a long line of Town Cars and taxis pulled up to the Minneapolis headquarters of Pillsbury and discharged 11 men who controlled America’s largest food companies. Nestlé was in attendance, as were Kraft and Nabisco, General Mills and Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola and Mars. Rivals any other day, the C.E.O.’s and company presidents had come together for a rare, private meeting. On the agenda was one item: the emerging obesity epidemic and how to deal with it. While the atmosphere was cordial, the men assembled were hardly friends. Their stature was defined by their skill in fighting one another for what they called “stomach share” — the amount of digestive space that any one company’s brand can grab from the competition.
James Behnke, a 55-year-old executive at Pillsbury, greeted the men as they arrived. He was anxious but also hopeful about the plan that he and a few other food-company executives had devised to engage the C.E.O.’s on America’s growing weight problem. “We were very concerned, and rightfully so, that obesity was becoming a major issue,” Behnke recalled. “People were starting to talk about sugar taxes, and there was a lot of pressure on food companies.” Getting the company chiefs in the same room to Continue reading
facebook event
